Training & enablement

AI training for your teams,built from scratch for you.

We come from both management and engineering, and we train on business cases you can put a number on. Every session is written after a scoping call, at the actual level of the people who will be in the room. On site in Paris or remote.

By Jean-Christophe BudinUpdated on

Two kinds of expertise, and a gain at the end

Business cases with the gain attached

A generic AI course explains what an LLM is. Fine. But once the room empties, the question left standing is always the same: what does this change here, for our business, with our data and our constraints?

We bring expertise on both sides, management and engineering. We have run and managed a business, and we also build the systems. That combination is rare, and it is what helps most: most of the blockers people describe to us are not technical, they are two teams using different words for the same problem.

Our position is that AI is only worth it if it returns something you can measure. We work on identified business cases with the expected gain next to them: hours recovered, errors avoided, lead times cut. And when the numbers say plain automation would do better for less, we say that too.

Fully bespoke

Content and examples get written after the scoping call. Two clients in the same industry do not get the same session.

On site in Paris or remote

At your offices in Paris and the Île-de-France region. Remote when your teams sit across several sites.

Management and engineering

An architecture constraint becomes a margin question. A business need becomes a technical choice. We hold both ends, in front of the same audience.

Content

What we cover

To be assembled depending on the audience and what you want to get out of it.

The concepts, minus the jargon

LLMs, embeddings, RAG, agents, fine-tuning, context windows, hallucination. Those notions laid out clearly, without overselling them.

Under the hood, live

What happens between the question and the answer. Why a model gets it wrong. What changes when you swap a source or a prompt. Hands on the keyboard, not commentary over diagrams.

What it does well, and what it fumbles

The uses where the technology delivers today, the ones where it disappoints, and the ones where a deterministic script would do better for less. With the costs and risks attached.

Costing the value before you commit

How to estimate the gain of a use case: what you can measure, what you will never measure, and the threshold above which it is worth doing at all.

On your own ground

Every notion is replayed on your cases. A quality manager and a lawyer do not ask the same question about hallucination, and do not need the same answer.

Demonstrations on your own cases

We show what AI produces on your documents and your use cases. Watching an idea run on your own data beats one more slide.

Generative AI, agents and automation

Training on generative AI, AI agents and automation. What can be handed to an agent, where to keep a human in the loop, how to measure the gain without kidding yourself.

AI inside your development process

Coding assistants, automated review, test generation: where your teams actually save time, where they lose it, and what it changes for code quality and review.

Audiences

You do not talk about AI the same way to everyone

Same subject, but neither the same level of detail nor the same examples.

Executive committee and leadership

AI training for the C-suite: where to invest and for what return, what risks you are taking, how fast to move, what sovereignty actually changes. Little technical detail. The subject is the trade-offs.

IT leadership and engineering teams

AI enablement for the IT department: architectures, security, inference costs, data governance. We also cover AI inside your development process, and the industrialisation traps you only see after shipping a first POC.

Managers and business teams

What AI changes in a working day: concrete uses on the tools they already have, limits worth knowing, and the moments when the answer deserves suspicion.

Independence

We are not AI evangelists

In plenty of cases, the right answer to a process that is stuck is not AI. It is deterministic automation, simpler and more reliable, or a redesign of the process itself. We own that: we only put AI where it genuinely adds something.

Ask This Guy also builds its own AI platform. That is a fair objection, so let us deal with it up front: our training is not a disguised product demo. We present and compare the other platforms on the market, proprietary and open models, American and European offerings.

Your teams should leave able to choose. When neither AI nor Ask This Guy is the right answer to your need, we say so during the session.

Partnership

Alongside your AI consultants

Already working with a consulting firm or a systems integrator on your AI strategy? We are not there to take their place.

We step in as a complement, on the technical and educational side: explaining how the building blocks really work, discussing the assumptions behind a scoping exercise, putting a demonstration behind a recommendation. Usually we get called when something has to be decided.

Our offer for integrators and AI consultants

How it runs

What a session looks like

  1. 1

    Scoping

    A conversation to pin down your subject, find out who will be in the room and at what level, and what those people should be able to do afterwards.

  2. 2

    Design

    We write the running order, take the examples from your industry and prepare the demonstrations on your cases.

  3. 3

    Delivery

    On site in Paris or remote. A short format for an executive committee, longer and more hands-on for a technical team.

  4. 4

    Follow-up

    The session materials, and answers to the questions left hanging. If you want to go further, that is when we talk about it.

Resources

Go further

Selected articles and videos to better understand this solution and see how it works in practice.

Articles

Frequently asked questions

Do you offer a catalogue of AI courses?

No, bespoke only. Every session is written after a scoping call, from your own subjects and the actual level of the people attending. A standard module would produce a session your teams have already seen elsewhere.

How do you measure the return on an AI use case?

By starting from the existing process rather than from the technology. We look at how long it takes today, where it produces errors and what those errors cost, then estimate what AI takes out of that. Some gains cannot be measured, and we say so too: three costed cases beat a list of twenty ideas.

Do you always recommend using AI?

No. On many processes, deterministic automation or simply redesigning the process gives a better result at lower cost and lower risk. We would rather say so during the training than let a team launch an AI project that does not justify itself.

Where do your enterprise AI training sessions take place?

On site at your offices in Paris and the Île-de-France region, or remotely for teams spread across several locations. On-site works better for hands-on workshops, remote suits awareness and enablement sessions well.

Who are these training sessions for?

Executive committees, IT leadership and engineering teams, and managers and business teams. Wearing both a business and an IT leadership hat mostly helps us bridge the two inside the same organisation.

Do you only train on your own platform?

No. We present and compare the other platforms on the market, proprietary models as well as open ones, American offerings as well as European ones. The goal is for your teams to be able to choose knowingly, not to leave convinced they should buy Ask This Guy.

Can you work alongside our AI consultants?

Yes, often. We step in alongside a consulting firm or an integrator already in place, on the technical and educational side: explaining how the building blocks really work, discussing the assumptions behind a scoping exercise and putting a demonstration behind a recommendation.

Can we see AI running on our own data?

Yes, and that is what we recommend. We prepare demonstrations on your documents and your use cases, so the discussion is about observable results rather than general principles.

Tell us what you need to get across

Thirty minutes is usually enough to tell whether we are the right people for your subject.